Dear Friends,
Recently, I was invited by Tally Software to speak at the Startup Conclave as a panel speaker. Interestingly, the topic is “Term Sheet to Trouble: Investor-Founder Relationships That Go Wrong”. I was doing a little research in this area and thinking about which social relationship resembles this issue.
I felt that it was the relationship between the mother-in-law (MIL) and daughter-in-law (DIL). If we go into deep social science, the most common issues in this relationship are ideological indifference, economic indifference, control indifference, or psychological indifference. We see this in many serials, movies, and common households.
A few examples could be (I am only quoting a few representative examples; sometimes they are reversed, or they may not exist as well. These are personal views only):
1. Ideological Indifference (Difference in beliefs/values) – MIL believes in traditional roles (family-first, joint decisions); DIL believes in individual autonomy (career-first, personal choice).
2. Economic Indifference (Money & resource decisions) – MIL prefers saving, frugality, and control over expenses; DIL prefers spending on lifestyle, experiences, or independence.
3. Control Indifference (Decision-making power) – MIL feels she has authority in household decisions; DIL wants equal say or independence.
4. Psychological Indifference (Emotional expectations) – MIL expects respect, acknowledgment, and inclusion; DIL expects space, understanding, and trust.
In a similar vein, the investor–founder relationship is subtle but critical. A few examples could be as follows:
1. Vision Alignment – Founder wants to build a long-term, sustainable company; investor wants quick scale and an exit.
2. Financial Alignment (Burn vs Runway) – Founder spends aggressively for growth; investor pushes for cost control and profitability.
3. Control & Governance Alignment – Investor has board seats and veto rights; founder expects operational freedom.
4. Expectation & Communication Alignment – Founder shares selective updates; investor expects full transparency and regular reporting.
We have seen many examples across the globe. Let's do a small quiz.
In the case of OpenAI, Elon Musk was an early co-founder and supporter when it was initially created as a non-profit focused on safe AI for humanity. OpenAI evolved into a capped-profit / commercial model. Musk exited OpenAI (2018) and later became a public critic of its direction. It is an example of Vision misalignment.
In the Byju's vs lenders/investors case, there is a tension between aggressive expansion and acquisitions, and cash flow and debt repayment pressures. Outcome: legal disputes with lenders, restructuring pressure, and valuation concerns. This comes under Financial misalignment.
Steve Jobs had a strong product vision and wanted to control the whole process, while the board pushed for professional management, structure, and stability. What was the outcome? Jobs was forced out of Apple Inc. in 1985. This is a classic case of Control & Governance Misalignment.
Let's evaluate the Indian case: Housing.com founder vs investors—communication style, governance expectations, and leadership differences. What was the outcome? Founder exited despite strong early growth (ET, 2015). This comes under Expectation & Communication misalignment.
Having said that, the world cannot exist without the MIL-DIL relationship. It is most sacred. At the end of the day, they make the family survive. The same applies to Founder and Investor. They make the business survive. These conflicts are given, but conflict resolutions are scientific and well-designed. That is the art of life and the art of business.
Do you see any other alignment issues beyond these four, either between MIL & DIL or between Founder & Investor?
Ravi Saripalle